Talk:Balaho

Merge

1. I Support the merge. Emosworld 06:50, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

What merge?

Picture

I just don't like it. Is there anything else that can be used?

Not really. That's all we have. --Dragonclaws^(talk) 17:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, that sucks.

Unfortunately it is the only pic that exists of the world. --EDFile:ArmyROTC.gif|15px]] 19:56, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

I did the best I could, mate. :) Blue Ninja 19:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Creatures

While reading Contact Harvest I saw two more creatures listed that haven't been mentioned yet so far as I know. On page 90, line 17 it mentions Mud Wasps and Shade Crabs. These two creatures aren't mentioned on the list of creatures on the Covenant main page. I'm only guessing these creatures are from Balaho since it mentions that Dadab remembers them from youth.-- Joshua 029 18:30, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Goblin

Awesome job, NightHammer. I did want to point out that goblins existed prior to Halo 5s events, though. TheEld (talk) 11:17, 10 September 2017 (EDT)TheEld

Thanks! And yeah, I assume you mean Envoy? I forgot about that reference to be honest. I also never noticed it before, but Hekabe refers to the Goblin as a heavy-lift suit for excavation. Perhaps the Unggoy modified it for combat? --NightHammer^{(talk)(contribs)} 11:46, 10 September 2017 (EDT)

And Halo Wars 2. The Banished had Goblins with them and they left for the Ark in March of 2558.TheEld (talk) 12:09, 10 September 2017 (EDT)TheEld2

That's true. Though I half-suspect that their inclusion is meant to be taken lightly and we can assume they were modified under different circumstances: "But wait, how did Yapyap get ahold of these incredible new machines and find time to modify them? Mind your own business is how.". --NightHammer^{(talk)(contribs)} 12:13, 10 September 2017 (EDT)

Planet images and backgrounds

"Tbh, I wouldn't mind if we kept the starry background for each planet."

— NightHammer

I wholeheartedly agree. The transparency works for some things, like weapons and equipment, but planets tend to look kind of off without their backgrounds intact. I'm fine with extracted backgrounds in galleries, but the title images should use their original backgrounds IMO. --Jugus (talk) 12:05, 10 September 2017 (EDT)

Disagree. Those backgrounds no in no way reflect the actual locations that the planets are in.TheEld (talk) 12:11, 10 September 2017 (EDT)TheEld